History

EMC VPLEX CASE STUDY

VMware HA automatically restarts them on the surviving site. The path policy should be set to FIXED to avoid writes to both legs of the distributed volume by the same host. We are happy to announce that the SolVe Online tool and training is now available for customers! May 24, Total Views: Single front-end FE path failure. Director failure at one site preferred site for a given Distributed Virtual Volume and BE array failure at the other site secondary site for a given Distributed Virtual Volume.

The first is to accelerate the day-to-day use of applications and to super-accelerate the nightly and end-of-month jobs of the life insurance applications. Multiple ESXi host failure s — Network disconnect. There is no down time if you configure FT on the virtual machines. Virtual machines running in preferred site are not impacted. No virtual machine failovers occur. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy , including cookie policy. For management and vMotion traffic, the ESXi hosts in both data centers must have a private network on the same IP subnet and broadcast domain.

Some look at it as a data migration solution while others look at it in its true rmc and glory meaning — a distributed cache that is virtualizing your underlying storage and provides an active — active site topology.

global actice device case studies

This diagram provides an overview: Click now in Slide Show mode for animation. We are happy to announce that the SolVe Online tool and training is now available for customers! May 24, Total Views: They can be restarted at site-A. You need to enable security on this component, as it could expose confidential information see Allowing User Impersonation. Related Resources To interact with this component, access the Preview mode. Round-trip-time for a non-uniform host access configuration is now supported up to 10 milliseconds for VPLEX Geosynchrony 5.

  FIL2A THESIS SAMPLE

Inger could see that the main bottleneck was storage, and he was looking for a solution that would make it possible to finish these jobs much earlier.

This topology requires the tedious data movement process to bring systems down, reconcile, and restart them.

Accelerate your business and IT transformation with cloud, big data, and technology consulting and services. Clal Insurance was looking for at least 3ms; they achieved 1. When the array is recovered from the failure, the storage volume at site-B is resynchronized from site-A automatically.

emc vplex case study

Each director is protected by redundant power supplies, fans, and interconnects, making the VPLEX highly resilient. The worlds leading developer and provider of information infrastructure technology and solutions that enable organizations of all sizes to transform the. This is common for traditional disaster recovery solutions today.

global actice device case studies | Hitachi Vantara Community

New actionable insights for your products and converged infrastructure! This article resolved my issue.

emc vplex case study

Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Workstations. Multiple ESXi host failure s — Power off.

  TAEKWONDO SPARRING THESIS

The ESXi hosts needs to be rebooted to recover from the failure. XtremIO fits right in. XtremIO was very stable, even during the early beta phase.

My presentations Stjdy Feedback Log out.

Implementing VMware vSphere Metro Storage Cluster (vMSC) using EMC VPLEX ()

Depending on the application, we got from two to ten times better performance with XtremIO compared to our existing storage environment. Single front-end FE path failure. To request a new product feature or to provide feedback on a VMware product, please visit the Request a Product Feature page. What can we do to improve this information?

All virtual machines fail since both sites are down. This approach resulted in small gains — instead of 2: In a uniform hosts access configuration, the virtual machines run without any impact since the ESXi hosts at Site-B can still access the distributed volume through Site-A.

On the preferred site, the Distributed Virtual Volumes continue to provide access. The spare capacity at the other site will be used to run the VMs that are failed over. Non-uniform Host Access — This type of deployment involve the hosts at either site and see the storage volumes through the same site storage cluster only.